10 hours ago
My approach to poker changed after I decided to have my game analyzed professionally. Before that, I studied whenever I had free time, jumping between preflop ranges, postflop strategy, and hands from difficult sessions. It was useful, but there was no clear system. I realized my own database could reveal more about my weaknesses than general lessons, so I ordered a full review. The analysis focused on real hands and showed situations where I repeated the same mistakes or missed opportunities to gain EV. I liked that the recommendations were connected to my actual play rather than being purely theoretical. While researching database review services, I came across Baseanalise and appreciated the focus on individual analysis. During further study, I also explored poker hand probabilities, which became easier to understand when connected to specific situations from my database. After receiving the results, I divided the recommendations into several areas and worked on them gradually instead of changing everything at once. The follow-up support was useful when I had questions about similar hands requiring different decisions. Overall, the review gave my studying a clearer structure: collect hands, identify recurring problems, work on them, and then evaluate the results again.